12.4. Mobility in Soil

This section provides information on how a substance moves through soil and potentially reaches groundwater. Soil mobility assessment is essential for evaluating environmental fate, predicting potential contamination of groundwater resources, and determining appropriate risk management measures for terrestrial ecosystems.

Soil Mobility Overview

Soil mobility refers to the ability of a substance to move through soil and potentially reach groundwater. It is influenced by both substance properties and soil characteristics:

  • Adsorption: Binding of a substance to soil particles, reducing mobility
  • Desorption: Release of a substance from soil particles, increasing mobility
  • Leaching: Downward movement of a substance through soil with water
  • Volatilization: Transfer of a substance from soil to air
  • Runoff: Horizontal movement of a substance with surface water

Key Soil Mobility Parameters

Parameter Definition Significance
Koc Organic carbon-water partition coefficient; measure of adsorption to soil organic carbon Primary indicator of soil mobility
Kd Soil-water partition coefficient; ratio of concentration in soil to concentration in water Soil-specific adsorption measure
Kf, 1/n Freundlich adsorption coefficient and exponent Non-linear adsorption parameters
Henry's Law Constant Air-water partition coefficient Indicator of volatilization potential from soil
GUS Index Groundwater Ubiquity Score; combines Koc and degradation half-life Predictor of groundwater contamination potential

Soil Mobility Classification

Based on Koc values, substances can be classified according to their mobility in soil:

Koc Value Mobility Class Description
< 50 Very high mobility Minimal adsorption, rapid leaching
50 - 150 High mobility Limited adsorption, significant leaching
150 - 500 Moderate mobility Moderate adsorption and leaching
500 - 2000 Low mobility Strong adsorption, limited leaching
2000 - 5000 Slight mobility Very strong adsorption, minimal leaching
> 5000 Immobile Extremely strong adsorption, negligible leaching

The GUS Index (Groundwater Ubiquity Score) combines Koc and degradation half-life:

GUS = log(half-life) × (4 - log(Koc))

  • GUS < 1.8: Low leaching potential
  • 1.8 ≤ GUS ≤ 2.8: Moderate leaching potential
  • GUS > 2.8: High leaching potential

Standard Test Methods

OECD Test Guidelines:

  • OECD 106: Adsorption/Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method
    • Determines Kd, Koc, Kf, and 1/n
    • Uses multiple soil types
  • OECD 121: Estimation of the Adsorption Coefficient (Koc) on Soil and Sewage Sludge using HPLC
    • Rapid screening method
    • Based on retention time on HPLC column
  • OECD 312: Leaching in Soil Columns
    • Simulates leaching under field conditions
    • Provides information on mobility and transformation products

Other Methods:

  • US EPA OPPTS 835.1230: Adsorption/Desorption (Batch Equilibrium)
  • US EPA OPPTS 835.1240: Leaching Studies
  • Lysimeter studies: Field-scale leaching assessment

Factors Affecting Soil Mobility

Substance Properties

  • Water solubility: Higher solubility generally increases mobility
  • Hydrophobicity (log Kow): Higher values generally decrease mobility
  • Ionization state: Affects adsorption to soil particles
  • Molecular size: Larger molecules may have reduced mobility
  • Volatility: Affects partitioning to soil air

Soil Properties

  • Organic matter content: Higher content increases adsorption of hydrophobic substances
  • Clay content: Higher content increases adsorption, especially for polar and ionic substances
  • pH: Affects ionization of substances and surface charges of soil particles
  • Cation exchange capacity: Higher CEC increases adsorption of cationic substances
  • Soil structure: Affects water flow and preferential pathways

Environmental Conditions

  • Rainfall/irrigation: Higher water input increases leaching
  • Temperature: Affects adsorption-desorption equilibria and degradation rates
  • Soil moisture: Affects adsorption sites availability and microbial activity
  • Depth to groundwater: Shorter distance increases contamination risk
  • Seasonal variations: Affect water table fluctuations and soil conditions

Example: Soil Mobility Data

Substance X Soil Mobility Profile:

  • Koc: 2000 L/kg
  • Kd: 150 L/kg (average across soil types)
  • Freundlich parameters: Kf = 120 L/kg, 1/n = 0.85
  • Henry's Law Constant: 3.2 × 10-5 Pa·m³/mol
  • GUS Index: 1.2
  • Mobility classification: Low mobility

Soil Column Leaching Test Results:

  • Sandy soil: 5% of applied substance detected in leachate
  • Clay soil: < 1% of applied substance detected in leachate
  • Organic soil: < 0.5% of applied substance detected in leachate

Soil Transport Characteristics

  • Vertical mobility: Limited due to strong adsorption to soil organic matter
  • Horizontal migration: Moderate, primarily with surface runoff
  • Surface runoff potential: Medium, especially during heavy rainfall events
  • Groundwater contamination risk: Low based on Koc value and GUS index
  • Volatilization from soil: Negligible based on Henry's Law Constant

Despite the generally low mobility, transport may be enhanced in sandy soils with low organic matter content or under conditions of heavy rainfall. Site-specific assessment is recommended for sensitive areas.

Soil Type Effects

Soil Type Kd (L/kg) Mobility Characteristics
Clay soils 250-300 Strong adsorption, very limited mobility
Sandy soils 50-100 Moderate adsorption, increased mobility
Organic soils 300-400 Very strong adsorption, high retention
Loamy soils 150-200 Moderate adsorption and mobility

pH dependency: The substance shows increased mobility at low pH (< 5) due to reduced ionization and weaker adsorption to soil particles.

Environmental Factors

  • Temperature influence: Minimal effect on adsorption within normal environmental range
  • Moisture effects: Increased soil moisture generally increases mobility by reducing available adsorption sites
  • Microbial activity impact: Significant, as degradation reduces the amount available for transport
  • Seasonal variations: Higher mobility expected during wet seasons due to increased water flow
  • Freeze-thaw cycles: May temporarily increase mobility due to soil structure changes

Implications for Environmental Risk Assessment

Regulatory Considerations

Modeling Approaches

Several models are available to predict soil mobility and leaching potential:

These models typically require input parameters such as Koc, degradation half-life, application rate, and soil/climate data to predict environmental concentrations.

Quality Assurance Checklist

  • Verify that soil adsorption tests follow recognized guidelines (e.g., OECD)
  • Ensure that multiple soil types are used to account for variability
  • Check that the mobility conclusion is consistent with the Koc data
  • Confirm that pH dependency of adsorption is addressed for ionizable substances
  • Verify that potential for groundwater contamination is assessed
  • Ensure that any limitations of the assessment are acknowledged